Application scoring consists of an Outcome Score and a Quality Score.
Outcome Score
How many of the following outcomes does your project meet?
Build housing that is 100% affordable OR the income of residents in all units in the project averages to an affordability band needed in the city (
view affordable housing need tracker)
Create new affordable homeownership opportunities for households earning 80% AMI or less
Rehab or preserve existing homes affordable to households living at 60% AMI or below for rental projects or 80% AMI or below for ownership projects
Reduce vacant or underutilized land through infill or redevelopment OR project is located in an eligible transit area (
view eligible transit areas, select “TOD Grant Areas” layer)
Create or rehab business incubators and/or small business development spaces
Future site use will add at least 10 living wage jobs and/or provide job training for at least 10 residents annually
Environmental cleanup in Environmental Justice areas (view
Environmental Justice Areas)
If your project meets one to three of these outcomes, it will receive 16 points. If it meets four or more of these outcomes, it will receive 24 points.
Build new rental housing with at least 10% of units in the project affordable to households living on 30% AMI or less OR the project meets 10% of the city’s need for units affordable to households living on 30% AMI
Project includes at least three 3+ bedroom units for families and are affordable to households living at 60% AMI or below for rental units OR all units are 3+ bedrooms and affordable to households living at or below 80% AMI for ownership projects
Project includes permanent community space that is accessible, open to the public, and intended to provide gathering space through amenities, community rooms, or other infrastructure that supports community gathering
Energy-saving activities, beyond in-unit fixtures and furnishings, that result in decarbonization, water efficiency, or reduced energy costs for cost-burdened residents
Create senior (55+) or youth-serving (aged 16-24) housing affordable to households living at 60% AMI or below
Build or rehab housing that serves people who have experienced homelessness
Design beyond minimum Americans with Disabilities Act requirements through universal design or similar strategies
Project serves American Indian people and is led by an American Indian organization
If your project meets one to three of these outcomes, it will receive 8 points. If your project meets four or more of these outcomes, it will receive 12 points.
The sum of the points earned from the two lists is your project’s Outcome Score.
Quality Score
Applications will be assessed on how well they meet the Livable Communities program goals using the following questions and corresponding maximum possible scores.
- How is the project helping the city to meet its identified development needs that are aligned with regional goals? (9 pts)
- How is the project benefiting people who are Black, American Indian, or part of another community of color? (9pts)
- How does the project improve access and safety in the neighborhood and provide direct, convenient connections to existing or planned transit or multi-use trails? (5 pts)
- Whose perspective is represented in the project through community engagement and/or as part of the development team? And how are their perspectives represented? (9 pts)
- How does the project maintain residents’ and/or businesses’ ability to stay in the community and maintain cultural and social community connections? (9 pts)
- Are the project team and funding sources identified? (4 pts)
- Is the project led by an emerging developer of color? (2 pts)
If the project is requesting environmental site investigation or cleanup funding, the following questions are also required.
- What is the severity of and risk of exposure to environmental contamination? (20 pts)
- What is the impact on the property tax base? (20 pts)
If the project is applying through the Minnesota Housing Consolidated Request for Proposals (RFP), the following criteria is evaluated.
- Does the city have contribution net tax capacities that exceed its distribution net tax capacities by more than $200 per household? (2 pts if yes)